Constitutional Environmental Rights: An Under-Utilised Resource
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Necessity and Possibilities of Constitutional Environmental Rights
This project attempts to give the reader a broad understanding of the nature and definition of a constitutional environmental right, what it would guarantee, whether it should be considered a human right. It goes on to discuss if environmental rights claims could be protected under existing legislation, the process of amending the U.S. Constitution, who currently has environmental rights, and f...
متن کاملDo Constitutional Rights Matter?∗
The critique of constitutions as mere parchment barriers is as old as the practice of writing them down. Yet states put a good deal of energy into drafting constitutions and some, inevitably, do so with the intention of abiding by their provisions. The purpose of the following article is to explore this possibility. I develop a theory of constitutional enforcement and test it using data spannin...
متن کاملOnline Appendix Do Constitutional Rights Matter?
The following document contains supplementary information for the article “Do Constitutional Rights Matter? The Relationship between De Jure and De Facto Human Rights Protection.” This information is organized into three sections. The first provides a description of the covariates included in the analysis and summary statistics for the data used in the article. The second section provides a ful...
متن کاملHorizontal Dimension of Constitutional Social Rights
The main purpose of this paper is to determine the applicability of the constitutional social rights in the so-called horizontal relations, i.e. the relations between private entities. Nowadays the constitutional rights are more and more often violated by private entities and not only by the state. The private entities interfere with the privacy of individuals, limit their freedom of expression...
متن کاملConstitutional rights and hypnotically elicited testimony.
Despite the former popularity of hypnosis as a way of "improving" eyewitness memory, many courts almost always regard the use of this testimony to be inadmissible, whereas others allow it only when strict procedural guidelines have been followed. Although the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a defendant's constitutional right to admit his own hypnotically elicited testimony, others have recognized...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: South African Journal on Human Rights
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0258-7203,1996-2126
DOI: 10.1080/19962126.2008.11864946